Comments for CTICoder

Comment on BizTalk 2009 and BTARN 3.5 on Windows Server 2008 Installation by Terry Thibodeau

Terry Thibodeau — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:55:01 +0000

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. Man, this was soooo frustrating!!!!

Comment on Windows 7 Slow. Constant Hard Drive Activity. by ciro

ciro — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:02:41 +0000

Thanks man that solved it over here too judgin how many people is experiencing that u should have a monument,google on that to have a rogue idea on how widespread the problem is,strange is over here it happened only few days after the installation…

Comment on Windows 7 Slow. Constant Hard Drive Activity. by John

John — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:52:02 +0000

That was exactly my problem as well. I was starting to wonder if I should go back to Vista, but everything is normal now.
Thanks for the info.

Comment on Anonymous Workflow Execution in Sharepoint 2007 by majox

majox — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:52:33 +0000

I can’t execute the workflow I get the classic out of memory error

Comment on Object Inheritance in Entity Framework by Scott Taylor

Scott Taylor — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:06:52 +0000

I’m not clear on how using a guid instead of an int is going to appreciably “mitigate the size” of the base table. Either way, you’re going to have one row per object instance, no matter how deep or shallow the rest of the hierarchy is. Using a guid for the primary key does make sense, however, but for the usual reasons of ensuring uniqueness in various scenarios.

I would recommend that you stay away from the idea of trying to make a “smart key” out of a guid…facts used for constraints should *always* be stored as separate attributes….the guid key should *only* be used to express relationships between tables (as well as to ensure that individual records can be reliably selected).

As far as retrieval performance goes, a properly indexed table hierarchy will, if anything, be faster than retrieving records from a single table (as in the Table-Per-Hierarchy scenario). If you are concerned about selecting the entire set of records at once (for example, your database with 330,000 items), I would recommend using some form of the data repository pattern, where you can select just the records of interest from what amounts to a virtual database layer.

Comment on Anonymous Workflow Execution in Sharepoint 2007 by Shaun McDonnell

Shaun McDonnell — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:33:32 +0000

When you say it is not working, how do you mean?

Comment on Anonymous Workflow Execution in Sharepoint 2007 by majox

majox — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:51:42 +0000

Hi I have tried to add an event receiver to list with your tutorial, but its not working . Even when I have so little code like this its not working:
public override void ItemAdded(SPItemEventProperties properties)
{

base.ItemAdded(properties);

}

Comment on Anonymous Workflow Execution in Sharepoint 2007 by Shaun McDonnell

Shaun McDonnell — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:13:04 +0000

Sorry, I don’t have this in a package but the code would work just fine in a server-farm environment.

-Shaun

Comment on Anonymous Workflow Execution in Sharepoint 2007 by steve

steve — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:10:18 +0000

Do you have this in a MS VS 2008 project or a package that can be deployed to SP Farm?

Comment on Anonymous Workflow Execution in Sharepoint 2007 by Richard

Richard — Tue, 26 May 2009 13:22:47 +0000

Very impressive website, good job